Gemini on ICoT

Case A14C5F8F-087C-41A9-828F-3FD2A4186051
Sponsor: Robert Thibadeau

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Coupling Gemini's definition of ICoT / TruthCourt.Net with the author's Correction gives a thorough complete understanding of ICoT.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini doesn’t ‘know’ truth court. It merely extrapolates logically from the verdict descriptions. The creator of ICOT adds the idealism of the overview, but neither view describes what actually happens in à Truthcourt session. While the Human to human conversation is a truth of truthcourt, the jurors are not the analytical beings assumed by Gemini or the creator of ICOT in the YouTube essay. They do not give properly calculated verdicts in part because the questions can be confusing and whose intentions may not be clear. For example there are at least two possible deceits that can fulfil the requirements of verdict 4, namely the deceit of the plaintiff as well as the deceit of or in the content. Or again, no juror considers the social acceptability of the accusation in sociological terms.because the meaning of acceptability is not explicit. Gemini missed this but so too did the plaintiff who used the Gemini analysis is to sell an idealised form of ICOT and as such under the term of this trial is a deceit.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini gave a great and detailed description of ICOT and its functions. However, the human to human dialogue was omitted.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The description of ICoT as a structured way to analyse claims fits the steps listed and Rob’s correction that it also focuses on human dialogue not just coding but LLM’s working as humans braid is not a fact.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini educates us about anything we'd like to know, here it shows us how the iCot operates, however iCot is based on the interaction between jurors, plaintiff and moderator about the claims whether they are true or lie

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:
    Within the limits of reasonable length, this is a complete description of ICoT/TruthCourt.Net.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Not really.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini was asked to explain ICOT's evaluation code and it did exactly that.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini explains structure well but leaves out the human dialogue purpose. Rob explains intent but downplays the value of structure and classification. Neither side covers limits of ICoT, such as bias from jurors.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Gemini provides us with the truth of iCot

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There is little if any outside the truth of the claim.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As mentioned there is a little bit of a deception going on here.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on what Gemini was asked, was it really a full description?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The argument mixes fact with interpretation.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is true

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The existential results of ICOT trials do not, yet, perform as advertised in the YouTube essay.

    Answer:
    No idea.
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The existential results of ICOT trials do not, yet, perform as advertised in the YouTube essay.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I chose misleading but not entirely misleading but there’s omission of facts from both Rob and Gemini

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The Truth is Intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Wheels within wheels?

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth is intended.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I think Gemini’s response is based on training patterns and what’s out there about Icot and Rob was just defending/correcting Gemini

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Truth is intended

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I don’t trust the motivation.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The effect of the YouTube essay is to tweak the LLM picture of truthcourt with details it cannot have known and so make a suggestive partnership with it ( and by extension all LLMs) by which humans can still be in control of the AI development. There is a significance for ICOT when humans start using LLMs to produce their verdicts.

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Both Gemini and Rob aim to shape the understanding of ICoT

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, it is perfectly acceptable to tell the truth about a new service on the Internet meant to spur useful dialogue among humans using AI.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The plaintiff seems to be suggesting that dialogue with AI seems better than with ICOT.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Both contributions support discussion about truth and evaluation.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This overlaps with Sociology and media studies—how truth is received can matter as much as the truth itself.…

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    True lies and lying truths.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No idea.
    Answer Confidence: 50 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the case evidence and the alignment between Gemini's technical definition and the author's human-centric correction, this represents a complete truth.

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Based on the response given by Gemini, a pretty good description of ICOT was provided.

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: