Weissman's Whole Truth

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth

     
    Argument
  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    A wonderful illustration that teaches how to do it.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Yes, IF "each question exposes the lie of omission with a statement of the truth believed to have been omitted, and the question of whether this claimed truth in the question is, in fact, true."

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Not sure about this one. Bob will have to explain a bit more.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    A wonderful illustration that teaches how to do it.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Quoting the Plaintiff: "Each question exposes the lie of omission with a statement of the truth believed to have been omitted, and the question of whether this claimed truth in the question is, in fact, true."

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    A person under oath is legally required to answer truthfully, but the claim that Blanche or others intentionally hid the whole truth would need evidence.…

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Weissmann's method is best understood as a technique for testing whether a witness is telling the complete truth, rather than a mechanism that compels them to do so. The oath creates the legal obligation; careful questioning helps determine whether that obligation is being met.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are probably many more examples as Weissmann indicated when he said this was just a few of the questions he would ask.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are more questions that could be asked to determine the truth.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Probably not.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are probably many more examples as Weissmann indicated when he said this was just a few of the questions he would ask.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    There are probably many more examples as Weissmann indicated when he said this was just a few of the questions he would ask.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The argument assumes that important information was deliberately omitted without providing specific examples of what was supposedly hidden...

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The argument assumes that important information was deliberately omitted without providing specific examples of what was supposedly hidden...

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Each question digs at incomplete releases of information.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As far as it goes, the questions attempt to get to the truth by exposing the omission.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    Will wait for more info from Bob.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Each question digs at incomplete releases of information.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Each question digs at incomplete releases of information.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    A questioning strategy can improve the chances of uncovering the truth, but it cannot guarantee a particular outcome. The effectiveness depends on many factors, including the witness's honesty, the examiner's skill, the available evidence, and the legal context.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:
    I don't think there is any deceit.

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The truth is intended, I think.

    Answer:
    Weissman's motivation was to try to teach the Senators looking to confirm Todd Blanche what good questions he needs to answer in order to be completely honest.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Weissman's motivation was to try to teach the Senators looking to confirm Todd Blanche what good questions he needs to answer in order to be completely honest.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Weissman's motivation was to try to teach the Senators looking to confirm Todd Blanche what good questions he needs to answer in order to be completely honest.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Weissman's motivation was to try to teach the Senators looking to confirm Todd Blanche what good questions he needs to answer in order to be completely honest.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Weissman's motivation was to try to teach the Senators looking to confirm Todd Blanche what good questions he needs to answer in order to be completely honest.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Possible motivations could include protecting political interests, avoiding legal consequences, protecting reputations, or influencing public opinion...

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    According to Andrew Weissmann's public commentary and his background as a prosecutor, the motivation behind this style of questioning is to test whether a witness is complying with the oath in substance, not just in form.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    More people need to understand how to do this. Particularly in the media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If it were done correctly.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    More people need to understand how to do this. Particularly in the media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    More people need to understand how to do this. Particularly in the media.

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Acceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    Does this expose the truth?
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 100 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: