Robin Hood Crime

Case A296CEBE-0DF1-41F4-A2FE-A68C30B3A051
Sponsor: Bright Plaza, Inc.

  • Status

    State
    Next Steps
    Case Date
    Watch Video
    Jurors Accepted
    Juror Verdicts Finalized

    The details, verdicts, and comments within this case record come from its participants. The Court's role is solely to facilitate the case process.

    Copyright © 2022-2026 Bright Plaza, Inc., All Rights Reserved. No one may publish a case, or any part of it, without a clear reference to the link with the case number as in https://www.truthcourt.net/case/<case-id-number>

  • Details

    Name
    Category
    URL
    Accusation
    Lie Truth
     
    Argument

  • Verdicts

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Robin Hood crime can involve taking resources from wealthy or powerful individuals, governments, government corporations, or wealthy politicians and redistributing them to disadvantaged people. The statement is also truthful in acknowledging that such acts remain illegal even when the motivation is redistribution.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Are you saying that it is moral to perform Robin Hood crime? Or that we are obliged to do it even though it may be immoral?

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I am against the Robin Hood crime because theft is theft. There is no "justifiable theft". If you steal from the government you are stealing from the very same people you claim you want to help because I believe government has no money without the people.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I support it in the part of taking money from politicians and government and giving it to the poor

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    No I think crime is crime we shouldn’t justify it.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    If someone takes from wealthy and powerful people and uses what they take to help disadvantaged people, the intention may be good and the outcome may benefit society.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The whole truth is that Robin Hood crime raises a conflict between legality and morality, and the circumstances, motivation, consequences, and people affected all matter when judging the act.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    As I said theft is theft and in my eyes there is no justifiable theft. As much as it can solve some problems people are facing it can also create instability in communities or in a country as a whole

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Because taking money from rich individuals or privilege is unfair because those people worked hard for their money unless if they stole from the state

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Even if the aim is to help the poorer, crime cannot be justified and should be treated like crime and the offenders should be charged.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is an unlawful behavior and in contradiction with the law as it could be harmful to the victims. If people believe that stealing is acceptable whenever they think they are helping others, more people might start committing crimes and using the same justification.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The argument does not claim that stealing is automatically good; it specifically supports Robin Hood-type crime where resources are taken from powerful or wealthy targets and directed toward genuine social need. It also recognises that the act can still be criminal under the law.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Self control is e everything here.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Even if the target is the government still it doesn't make it right. So I completely disagree with the argument.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Government should atleast have kitchen soups to provide for underprivileged people.

    Answer: No
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Good intentions do not automatically make an illegal act acceptable. Otherwise, anyone could justify a crime by claiming that they were helping others.

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The potential deceit would be presenting Robin Hood crime as completely harmless or automatically morally correct. In reality, taking resources from governments, corporations, or wealthy politicians can still cause legitimate harm, and the redistribution does not automatically excuse the method used

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Theft is property?

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This is manipulating. Making people believe that the Robin Hood crime is justified is false because it will benefit only few people that are chosen by that person or organisation that is doing this not necessarily everybody that is poor

    Answer:
    There is no deceit.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    We cannot justify crime

    Answer:
    The deceit is that the lie is misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    We can not justify fraud in the name of good intentions.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    . The purpose is to challenge the assumption that something is morally wrong simply because it is illegal and to question whether protecting extreme wealth should always take priority over addressing serious poverty and deprivation.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Taxes and governments are better.

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Deceit is intended because stealing from the government means stealing from the people because government has no money without the people.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Yes
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    I'm not sure what's plaintiff's intentions about this, but I think there's no truth in breaking law and justify it with goodwill.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    This may be a deceit trying to misleading people making them beleive that these actions are good actions.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to challenge inequality and question the moral priorities of society.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It draws attention to situations where governments, government corporations, or wealthy politicians possess significant resources while ordinary citizens experience poverty and inadequate public services.

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It doesn’t dress systemic inequality.

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Motivation is to make people believe that theft CAN be justifiable and also poor people somehow have a right to "take" from the rich

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to be informative
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    The motivation is to convince you that the lie is factually true.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    I'm not sure what the motivation is.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is controversial but socially understandable. Most people would reject theft as a general principle, but many may sympathise with the idea of redistributing resources when the targets are extremely powerful and the beneficiaries are people experiencing genuine hardship.

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    The plaintiff is disagreeing with their own case.

    Answer: Unacceptable
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    Robin Hood crime does more crw than good and the argument is misleading

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 95 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer: Don't Know
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    People expect everyone to act in good morals so because this is unlawful it may not be acceptable.

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It is morally acceptable to question whether wealth and political power deserve greater protection than people living in severe deprivation, particularly when the resources involved are public or have been obtained through corruption or abuse of power.

    Answer:
    This is not true, and is manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but manipulating.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:
    It making poor people believe that they can take law to their hands and theft is justifiable

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 70 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    No label needed
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text:

    Answer:
    This is true, but misleading.
    Answer Confidence: 90 %
    Supporting Text: